Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8848 (PNJ)

VINAY KUMAR v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

CWP/39451/2025 · 2026-09-03

Sudeepti Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

235 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-39451-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 03.09.2026 Vinay Kumar ......Petitioner Vs. Union of India and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present : Mr. Kshitiz Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner. None for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Indersh Goel, Advocate, for respondent No.3. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (ORAL) 1. The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the e-mail dated 12.09.2025 (Annexure P-8) and reasons thereof provided through RTI, whereby the petitioner’s application was rejected as well as quashing of letter dated 18.11.2025 (Annexure P-9). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance sought in the present writ petition has been redressed, therefore, he seeks to withdraw the present writ petition. 3. In view of the above, the present civil writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE 03.09.2026 Virender Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.09.10 10:39 I agree to specified portions of this document