Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8848 (GAU)

SURUT ZAMAN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/551/2025 · 2025-04-01

Susmita Phukan Khaund

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010050122025 2025:GAU-AS:3845 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/551/2025 SURUT ZAMAN S/O ALI AKBAR AHMED, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KISMOT KATHMI, PO DEKACHANG, PS BOKA, DIST KAMRUP ASSAM 781136 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY PP ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR N AHMED, S BASUMATARY,MS. S DEVI,MR H R A CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER Date : 02-04-2025 Heard Mr. N. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D.P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. 2. Case Diary is received. Page No.# 2/2 3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he has misappropriated funds meant for Hajj pilgrims. 4. I have scrutinized the Case Diary. There are indeed incriminating materials in the Case Diary against the petitioner. However, the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer and has cooperated with the investigation. The petitioner has not violated any bail conditions. The petitioner is on interim bail vide order dated 10.03.2025 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court. 5. Interim order dated 10.03.2025 is hereby made absolute. 6. In terms of the above observation, this Anticipatory Bail application stands disposed of. 7. Send back the Case Diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant