2025:KER:22137 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 20TH PHALGUNA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 41780 OF 2024 PETITIONER/S: JESSY BABY, AGED 56 YEARS W/O.BABY, PULIKKODAN HOUSE, PULLUR P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680683 BY ADVS. BINOY VASUDEVAN SREEJITH SREENATH RINCY KHADER K.V.RAJESWARI SUSHAMA DEVI M. RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE TAHSILDAR (LAND RECORDS), TALUK OFFICE, PALACE ROAD, THRISSUR, PIN - 682020 2 THE VILLAGE OFFICER, OLLUR VILLAGE, OLLUR (PO), THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680306 Smt.Deepa.V, G.P THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.C No.41780 of 2024 2 2025:KER:22137 JUDGMENT The petitioner is the absolute owner in possession of property having an extent of 65.50 Ares comprised in Re.Sy No.152/29-3 (Old Sy.Nos.781/pt, 780/pt and 775/pt) of Ollur Village in Thrissur Taluk. The predecessor-in-interest of the petitioner has already obtained permission to utilize the property which is described as 'Paddy Land' in the revenue records, for non agricultural purposes as per Ext.P4 to P7 orders under the provisions of the Clause 6 of the Kerala Land Utilization order prior to the enactment of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act. On the basis of the same, Ext.P9 Form A application was submitted, under Section 6 A of Kerala Land Tax Act. As there was delay in consideration of the same, the petitioner approached this Court by filing W.P.(C) No.27771/2024 which culminated in Ext.P10 order. In Ext.P10, a direction was issued by this Court to the Tahasildar (Land Records), to consider the application submitted by the petitioner in Form A, after ensuring the genuineness of W.P.C No.41780 of 2024 3 2025:KER:22137 Ext.P4 to P7 (Ext.P3 to P3(c) referred to in the said judgment) and ascertaining the identity of the property and pass appropriate orders on the same, strictly in terms of the Act within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the said judgment. 2. However, despite the said direction, Ext.P12 order was passed by the 1st respondent stating that, in the meantime, as per Ext.P11 order passed by this court, the question as to whether a person who obtained orders under Clause 6 of Kerala Land Utilization order has to undergo the conditions imposed in Section 27A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008, was referred to a Full Bench. Therefore, according to the 1st respondent, a decision cannot be taken, on the Form A application. This writ petition is submitted by the petitioner in such circumstances challenging Ext.P12. 3. Heard, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents. W.P.C No.41780 of 2024 4 2025:KER:22137 4. In the decision rendered by the Honourable Supreme Court in The Tahasildar v. Renjith George [2025 1 KHC 271], the Honourable Supreme Court categorically observed that, the parties who have submitted applications under Clause 6 of the KLU order, prior to the enactment of the Amendment Act 2018 to the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land Wetland Act, 2008, are not liable to comply with the conditions imposed under Section 27 A of the Act. The said aspect was clarified by the Full bench of this Court in Mukthar Ali v. State of Kerala [2024 KHC 1570] as well. Now in the light of the legal proposition laid down by the Honourable Supreme Court in the above referred decisions, the stand taken by the 1st respondent in Ext.P12 is not legally sustainable. 5. Thus, it is evident that, since the petitioner had obtained orders under Clause 6 of KLU order, prior to the introduction of Section 27A of Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, the conditions imposed as per the said provision, cannot be made applicable to the petitioner. W.P.C No.41780 of 2024 5 2025:KER:22137 Therefore the consequence of the same is that, the Form A application submitted by the petitioner has to be considered without insisting for compliance of the conditions imposed under Section 27A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act. Therefore, the directions issued by this Court in Ext.P10 have to be implemented by the 1st respondent, who is the competent authority. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of, quashing Ext.P12, with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the application submitted by the petitioner in Form A as directed in Ext.P10 judgment. The same shall be done within a period of two months from the date of copy of this judgment. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE rpk W.P.C No.41780 of 2024 6 2025:KER:22137 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 41780/2024 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF DOCUMENT NO.1257/2007 DATED 06-12-2007 OF S.R.O KUTTANELLOR Exhibit P-2 TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENT NO.5542 OF 1996 DATED 16-12-1996 OF S.R.O KUTTANELLOR Exhibit P-3 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPOSITE TAX RECEIPT DATED 22.04.2024 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT Exhibit P-4 TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO. K.DIS.SR- 134/96/D1 DATED 12-04-1996 ALONG WITH ITS TYPED COPY Exhibit P-5 TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO.K.DIS- 10137/95/D1 DATED 13.10.1995 ALONG WITH ITS TYPED COPY Exhibit P-6 TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO. K.DIS. SR.132/96/D1 DATED 12.04.1996 ALONG WITH ITS TYPED COPY Exhibit P-7 TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO. K.DIS.SR.133/96/D1 DATED 12.04.1996 ALONG WITH ITS TYPED COPY Exhibit P-8 TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 08.07.2024 Exhibit P-9 TRUE COPY OF THE FORM A APPLICATION DATED 08.07.2024 Exhibit P-10 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO.27771 OF 2024 DATED 09-09-2024 W.P.C No.41780 of 2024 7 2025:KER:22137 Exhibit P-11 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF REFERENCE DATED 12-09-2024 IN W.A.NO.1061 OF 2023 Exhibit P-12 TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO.B10/3960/2024 DATED 05-11-2024 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT