NO.G/105218L RIFLEMAN (GD) RAM PRASAD SHARMA v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS
WP(C)/1400/2024 · 2025-08-10
Kaushik Goswami
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8846 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8846 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010049802024
2025:GAU-AS:10531
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1400/2024 NO.G/105218L RIFLEMAN (GD) RAM PRASAD SHARMA HQ COY, 10 ASSAM RIFLES, C/O- 99 APO, PIN- 932010. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI-110001.
2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL ASSAM RIFLES SHILLONG MEGHALAYA-793011.
3:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE RECORD BRANCH (ADM-1 GD PROM) DIRECTORATE GENERAL ASSAM RIFLES SHILLONG-793011.
4:THE COMMANDANT HQ COY 10 ASSAM RIFLES C/O- 99 APO Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A R TAHBILDAR, Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MRS. A GAYAN
Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 11.08.2025 Heard Mr. A. R. Tahbildar, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner. Also heard Ms. P. Rabha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mrs. A. Gayan, learned CGC, for the respondents. Mr. A. R. Tahbildar, learned counsel, submits that the writ petition has become infructuous and, accordingly, makes an endorsement to the same effect. In view of the aforesaid endorsement made by the learned counsel for the writ petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed on being infructuous. The writ petition accordingly, is disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant