- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40351 WP No. 23500 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 23500 OF 2025 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RANGASHAMAIAH O.R. SON OF RANGE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS 2. SMT. SHILPA N.R. WIFE OF RANGASHAMAIAH O.R. AGED 37 YEARS BOTH RESIDING AT: NO.69, FIRST FLOOR, 2ND CROSS, FIRST MAIN, FIRST BLOCK, 'D' GROUP LAYOUT, ANDRAHALLI MAIN ROAD, VISHWANEEDAM POST, BENGALURU-560091 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MELANIE SEBASTIAN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE (BBMP) HAVING IT'S OFFICE AT: M.S. BUILDING B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD HUDSON CIRCLE BENGALURU-560 002 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2. THE ZONAL COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE (BBMP) RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR ZONE 18TH CROSS, IDEAL HOMES LAYOUT, RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR, Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40351 WP No. 23500 of 2025 NEAR BESCOM OFFICE, BENGALURU-560 098. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.S.KARTHIKEYAN, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 AND 2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTICE BEARING DOCUMENT NO.RRNB/195/2024-25 DATED 11.06.2025 ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONERS VIDE ANNEXURE -A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER The petitioners have challenged a confirmation order bearing No.ªÀ.D/gÁgÁ£ÀªÀ/195/24-25 dated 11.06.2025 passed by respondent No.2 under Section 248(3) read with Section 356(1) of the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike Act, 2020. 2. When this petition was listed for 'Preliminary Hearing', it was brought to the notice of the learned counsel for the petitioners that there is appeal remedy. The learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file an appeal before the appropriate - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40351 WP No. 23500 of 2025 authority. He however, prays that until filing of an appeal, the impugned order be stayed. 3. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed. Liberty is reserved to the petitioners to file an appeal before the appropriate authority in accordance with law. 4. The impugned order bearing No.ªÀ.D/gÁgÁ£ÀªÀ/195/24-25 dated 11.06.2025 passed by respondent No.2 under Section 248(3) read with Section 356(1) of the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike Act, 2020 is stayed only for a period of fifteen days from today, within which time, the petitioners shall file an appeal before the appropriate authority and obtain interim orders. 5. It is made clear that the order of stay of the impugned order is only for a period of fifteen days from today and not beyond that period. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE PMR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29