Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 88454 (KAR)

MR.K.MANJUNATH v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/7664/2022 · 2025-11-13

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46328 WP No. 7664 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 7664 OF 2022 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: MR.K.MANJUNATH S/O K THIPPESWAMY NO.BLK 209, NO.04-1337 TAMPINES STREET 21 AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS SINGAPORE PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.303 GODAVARI APARTMENT 9TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE - 560 003. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VAKKUND SONATAI GANAPATRAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPT. OF HOME VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDET OF POLICE KALABURAGI - 585 103. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISISONER Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46328 WP No. 7664 of 2022 MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA KALABURAGI - 585 103. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE MALLESHWARAM POLICE STATION BANGALORE - 560 003. 5. THE CPI MALLESHWARAM POLICE STATION BANGALORE - 560 003. 6. DR ROOPA MULGUND @ SHALINI HOSAMANI NO.349/2, 11TH CROSS SAMPIGE ROAD, MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE - 560 003. 7. SIDDHARTH CHENNAPPA HOSAMANI NO.349/2, 11TH CROSS SAMPIGE ROAD, MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE - 560 003. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTER, AGA FOR R1 TO R5; SMT. BHUSHANIKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R6) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO RESTRAIN THE R-1 TO R-5 FROM HANDING OVER THE CUSTODY OF THE CHILD ARNAV KAMASHETTY TO R-6 OR R-7 OR ANY OTHER AUTHORITY AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46328 WP No. 7664 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer made in the writ petition has become infructuous. The submission is taken on record. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE GH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37