APHC010095262011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 25464 OF 2011 Between: 1. DIR (FINANCE), ANRAK ALUMINIUM LTD., HYDERABAD., having its Registered Office at Plot No.705, Road No.3, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad - 34 Rep by its Director (Finance) S. Ganapati Rao. ...Petitioner AND 1. M D A P INDUL INFRASTRUCTURE CORP LTD HYD 3 OTHERS, Ltd., 5- 9-58/B, 6th Floor, Parishrama Bhavan, Fatehmaidan Road, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. Rep by its Managing Director 2. The Zonal Manager, The A.P. Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd., Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 3. The Land Acquisition Officer, (Special Grade Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition) Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd., Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 4. The Tahsildar, Makavarapalem Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: S SASIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: B P MOHAN Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents:A JAYANTHI 2 The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Ms. Munnangi Thanmai Krishna, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Gurram Ramachandra Rao, learned Standing Counsel for APIIC is present. 2. None appeared for the Writ Petitioner on 21.07.2025. This Court had directed to be listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. 3. Today also none appeared on behalf of the Writ Petitioner. 4. This matter is of the year 2011 and, therefore, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served by keeping it pending on the file of this Court inasmuch as the Writ Petitioner has not evinced any interest in prosecuting this Writ Petition. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for Non-prosecution. No order as to costs. 6. However, there shall be a direction to the Registry to preserve the record for a period of twelve (12) weeks from today in order to enable the parties to file an appropriate Application for Restoration, if the Writ Petitioner is of the opinion that the cause of action still survives. 7. If such Application is not filed within the fixed time, the Registry is at liberty to destroy the record four (04) weeks after the expiry of the said twelve (12) weeks period as per the procedure. 8. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 23.07.2025 JKS 3 42 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No. 25464 OF 2011 23.07.2025 JKS