- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46962 WP No. 28057 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 28057 OF 2024 (L-PG) BETWEEN: N.T.RAHAMATHULLA KHAN ASSOCIATES, NO.13/11, PAMPA MAHAKAVI ROAD, SHANKARAPURAM, BENGALURU – 560003. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPREET PAL, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: THE LABOR OFFICER AND COURT OF CONTROLLING AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972, DIVISION-6, KARMIKA BHAVAN, DAIRY CIRCLE, BANNERGHATA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560010. …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through vide Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46962 WP No. 28057 of 2024 conferencing. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 08.07.2025, on that day, two weeks time was granted to comply with the office objections. Again, the petition was listed on 23.08.2025, on that day, a week’s time was granted to comply the office objections. The petition is listed today for orders regarding non- compliance of office objections for the third time. A perusal of the entire order sheet reveals that despite giving sufficient time, the office objections are not complied with. As already noted above, when the case is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections and also for non-prosecution. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE KMV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16