Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26784 CRL.P No. 9022 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9022 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS) BETWEEN:
ARUN V., AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, S/O VEDIYAPPAN, R/A NO. 78, HOSANAGAR, SADANANDA NAGAR, BENGALURU …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAKSHITH R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY BYAPANAHALLI PS, REP. BY SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU – 560 001
2.
PAPPU SHARMA S/O JUGAL SHARMA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/A NO. 05, C BUILDING,
2ND MAIN, 4TH CROSS, KRISHNAIAHNAPALYA, BENGALURU CITY, KARNATAKA – 560 038
3.
CHIEF SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL PRISON, PARAPPANNA AGRAHARA, BANGALORE – 560 068 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. NAGESHWARAPPA K., HCGP FOR R1 & R3;
VIDE ORDER DATED 17.07.2025, NOTICE TO R2 IS DISPENSED WITH)
Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26784 CRL.P No. 9022 of 2025
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 CR.P.C (U/S 528 BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE ARREST OF PETITIONER DATED 10.10.2022 IN CR.NO.131/2022 OF BYAPPANAHALLI P.S., FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 302 R/W 34 OF IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF 13th ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-22) M.H.UNIT, BENGALURU IN SC.NO.225/2023 AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT RESPONDENT NO.3 TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER FROM JDICIAL CUSTODY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
In this petition, petitioner seeks for the following reliefs:-
“The above named petitioner humbly pray that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to quash the arrest of petitioner dated 10.10.2022 in Crime No.131/2022 of Byappanahalli Police Station for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of IPC pending on the file of 13th ACC & SJ (CCH-22), M.H.Unit, Bengaluru in S.C.No.225/2023 and consequently direct Respondent No.3 to release the petitioner from judicial custody in the interest of justice.”
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned HCGP for respondent No.1 and 3 and perused the material on record. For the order proposed, notice to respondent No.2 is dispensed with. - 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26784 CRL.P No. 9022 of 2025
3. In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged in the petition and referring to the material on record, learned counsel for the petitioner invited my attention to the material on record in order to point out that the requisite grounds of arrest as mandated under Article 22(1) of the Constitution of India as well as Sections 47 and 48 of BNSS, 2023 have not been issued either to the petitioner or to his relatives and in the light of the decisions of the Apex Court in the cases of Pankaj Bansal Vs. Union of India – (2024) 7 SCC 576, Prabir Purkayastha Vs. State (NCT of Delhi) – (2024) 8 SCC 254 and Vihaan Kumar Vs. State of Haryana – 2025 INSC 162 and the impugned remand of the petitioner to the judicial custody be quashed and concerned respondents be directed to release the petitioner on bail. It is further submitted that the co-accused namely Sakthi Velu G @ Sakthi, who is accused No.2 in the very same crime number was released on bail by this Court in Crl.P.No.7570/2025 dated 10.06.2025 and on this score also, the petitioner may be released on bail. 4. Learned HCGP for respondent Nos.1 and 3 submits that grounds of arrest were not furnished / communicated to the
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26784 CRL.P No. 9022 of 2025
petitioner as required in law and necessary orders in the instant case may be passed. 5.
A perusal of the material on record will indicate that in the instant case, grounds of arrest have not been furnished or communicated to the petitioner and / or to his relatives, friends etc., as required in law and in the light of the principles enunciated in the aforesaid judgments and in view of accused No.2 being released on bail in aforesaid case, by applying the doctrine of parity, I am of the view that the petition deserves to be allowed and petitioner is entitled to be released on bail by imposing certain conditions. 6. In the result, I pass the following:-
ORDER (i) Petition is hereby allowed. (ii) The impugned arrest of the petitioner on 10.10.2022 in Crime No.131/2022 registered by respondent No.1 Police and consequential remand order dated 11.10.2022 passed by the XI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, are hereby quashed. (iii) The 1st respondent - Police as well as the 3rd respondent - Jail Authorities are directed to release the petitioner
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26784 CRL.P No. 9022 of 2025
on bail forthwith and immediately upon a receipt of a copy of this
order, subject to the following conditions: a) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly threaten or tamper with the evidence, witnesses etc., of the respondents ; b) The petitioner shall not involve in similar offences in future; c) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation; d) The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of this Court without the prior permission of the Court; e) Each of the petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with one surety for the likesum to the satisfaction of the Trial Court within a period of two weeks from the date of his release. f) The petitioner shall produce his address / identity proof before the Jail authorities at the time of his release. g) The petitioner shall mark their attendance before the SHO of the jurisdictional police station between 10.00 a.m. and 02.00 p.m., once in two weeks. h) Liberty is reserved in favour of the prosecution as well as the Trial Court to take appropriate action against the petitioner including cancellation of bail, in
- 6 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26784 CRL.P No. 9022 of 2025
the event they violate any of the terms and conditions mentioned above.
Registry is directed to communicate this order to the 1st respondent - Police as well as the 3rd respondent - Jail Authorities forthwith without any delay both electronically and telephonically to enable immediate implementation of this order.
Hand delivery of this order is permitted.
Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
MDS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 88