- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43636-DB COMAP No. 561 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 561 OF 2025 BETWEEN: CORPORATE INFOTECH PVT LTD HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT E-81, SECTOR-6, NOIDA, UTTAR PRADESH-201 301. ALSO AT A-16, BASEMENT, JANGPURA EXTENSION, MASJID ROAD, NEW DELHI-110 014, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, MR. M. KRISHNA MURTHY RAO SHINDHE, S/O. SRI. MAHADEVA RAO SHINDHE, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, EMAIL info@cipl.org.in …APPELLANT (BY SRI. B C VENKATESH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. EZETAP MOBILE SOLUTIONS PVT LTD HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT FIRST FLOOR, SJR CYBER, 22, Digitally signed by NIRMALA DEVI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43636-DB COMAP No. 561 of 2025 LASKAR HOSUR ROAD, ADUGODI, BENGALURU-560 030, ALSO AT L-374, 5TH MAIN ROAD, SECTOR-6, HSR LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560 102, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, MR. PUNEETH UPADHYAYA, EMAIL finance@ezetap.com 2. RAJCOMP INFO SERVICES LIMITED HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 1ST FLOOR, C BLOCK, YOJANA BHAWAN, TILAK MARG, C-SCHEME, JAIPUR-302 005, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, EMAIL-diotc.aua@rajasthan.gov.in …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ADITYA CHATTERGEE, ADVOCATE FOR C/R) THIS COMAP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 13 (1-A) OF COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 02.06.2025 PASSED ON I.A. NO.1 IN COM.O.S.NO.1726/2024 BY THE LXXXIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT), BENGALURU (CCH-90) VIDE ANNEXURE A AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43636-DB COMAP No. 561 of 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks to withdraw the present appeal. 2. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. 3. We clarify that the withdrawal of the present petition would not be construed as an opportunity to pursue the same and the petition shall be considered needless to say that the petition is being disposed of. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE BS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5