Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 88405 (KAR)

UMESH MESTHA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/30680/2025 · 2025-10-15

M G Uma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41028 WP No. 30680 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA WRIT PETITION NO. 30680 OF 2025 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: UMESH MESTHA S/O. SADANANDA MESTA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS HADAVINA KONE, SHIROOR POST KUNDAPURA, UDUPI - 576 124. …PETITIONER (BY SMT: KAVITHA .N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION SOCIETY VIDHANA SOUDHA DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR THE RECOVERY OFFICER OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES KUNDAPURA SUB DVN KUNDAPURA - 576 247. 3. GANESH CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD, (REGISTERED UNDER CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY ACT) REP BY ITS CEO, MULLIKATTE HOSAADU, KUNDAPURA - 576 247. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI: YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R1 & R2 SRI: PURNACHANDRA .M. PURANIK, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FORM NO.8 AND 9 AUCTION NOTICES DATED 03.09.2025 ISSUED BY THE Digitally signed by NANDINI B G Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41028 WP No. 30680 of 2025 RECOVERY OFFICER OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, KUNDAPURA SUB DVN, KUNDAPURA IN DECREE NO.534/2023-24 E.P. NO.343/2024-25 AT ANNEXURE-A AND B AND ALL OTHER FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT THERETO, (IN SO FAR AS PETITIONERS CONCERN) AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for respondent No.3 submits that auction as proposed was not taken. Under such circumstances, the petition has rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner also conceded to the submission made by learned counsel for respondent No.3. Hence, the petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE *bgn/- CT:VS List No.: 3 Sl No.: 11