Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 88388 (KAR)

SRI KEERTHAN S KUMAR v. SRI VENU

WA/1782/2024 · 2025-08-20

C M Joshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32344-DB WA No. 1782 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KANATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI WRIT APPEAL NO. 1782 OF 2024 (BDA) BETWEEN: 1. SRI KEERTHAN S KUMAR AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS SON OF LATE SRI V. SHASHIKUMAR NO. 211, 5TH CROSS NEAR VIJAYA BANK DOMLUR LAYOUT DOMLUR, BANGALORE - 560 071 2. SMT. PRAMILA SHASHIKUMAR AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS WIFE OF LATE V. SHASHIKUMAR NO. 211, 5TH CROSS NEAR VIJAYA BANK DOMLUR LAYOUT DOMLUR, BANGALORE - 560 071 3. SMT. MONICA S. KUMAR AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS DAUGHTER OF SMT. PRAMILA SHASHIKUMAR AND LATE V. SHASHIKUMAR NO. 211, 5TH CROSS NEAR VIJAYA BANK DOMLUR LAYOUT, DOMLUR BANGALORE - 560 071 Digitally signed by AMBIKA H B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32344-DB WA No. 1782 of 2024 REP. BY HER GPA HOLDER APPELLANT NO. 2 SMT PRAMILA SHASHIKUMAR …APPELLANTS (BY SRI GIRIDHAR S.V, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI VENU AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS SON OF LATE V. VENKATASWAMAPPA RESIDING AT NO. 42 VICTTORY MANSION 1ST MAIN ROAD, SHESHADRIPURAM BANGALORE - 560 020 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M. S. BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE - 560 001 3. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 …RESPONDENTS (SRI K.S. HARISH, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT No.2) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 26/11/2024 PASSED IN W.P.NO.22154/2023 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HONBLE COURT & ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32344-DB WA No. 1782 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. The learned counsel appearing for the appellants seeks to withdraw the present appeal. He submits that the appeal has been rendered infructuous as the writ petition has been decided in favour of the appellants. 2. The writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE AHB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33