Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8838 (MAD)

Vijil Kumar v. Sundari

CMP(MD)/10667/2025 · 2026-07-21

T V Thamilselvi

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMP(MD). No.10667 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 21/07/2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CMP(MD). No.10667 of 2025 in SA(MD)No.SR19371 of 2022 Vijil Kumar, ... Petitioner Vs. 1. Sundari, W/o.Muthu Nadar, D/o.Kunjukrishnan Nadar, Kaniyanvilai Veedu, Athencode Desom, Kulappuram Village, Vilavancode Taluk, Kanyakumari Distri. 2. Vasanthakumari, W/o.Muthu Nayakam, Kaniyanvilai Veedu, Athencode Desom, Kulappuram Village, Vilavancode Taluk, Kanyakumari District.. 3. Vijayakumari, W/o.Devaraj, D/o.Kunjukrishnan Nadar, Kattuviilai Veedu, Nattalam West, Nattalam Desom, Nattalam Village, Vilavancode Taluk,Kanyakumari. 4. Vijayakumaran, (Died) S/o.Kunjukrishnan Nadar, Chemmankala Vadakkey Puthen Veedu @ Eloorkadu Veedu, Ayankaamam Desom, Kulappuram Village, Vilavancode Taluk, Kanya. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP(MD). No.10667 of 2025 5. Selvakumaran, S/o.Kunjukrishnan Nadar, Chemmankala Vadakkey Puthen Veedu @ Eloorkadu Veedu, Ayankaamam Desom, Kulappuram Village, Vilavancode Taluk, Kanya. 6. Leela, D/o.Poul Ndar, W/o.Vijayakumaran, Chemmankala Vadakkey Puthen Veedu @ Eloorkadu Veedu, Ayankaamam Desom, Kulappuram Village, Vilavancode Taluk. 7. Vibin Kumar, S/o.Vijayakumar, Elurkadu, Chemmankala Vadakkey Puthen Veedu, Kullapuram Desom, Kulappuram Village, Vilavancode Taluk, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents 8.Vinukumar, United Engineers, Trading & Constrating LLC, C.R.No.1514239 P.O.Box 100, Postal Code : 120, Sultanate of Oman. (R8 bring on record the LRs of deceased R4, vide Court order dated 21.07.2026 in CMP(MD)No.1997 of 2026) ... 8th Respondent/ LRs of deceased R4 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP(MD). No.10667 of 2025 PRAYER :- To condone the delay of 1103 days in representing the papers in S.A.SR(MD) No.19371 of 2022 before this Court and pass such other suitable orders and thereby render justice. For Petitioner : Mr.H.Lakshmi Shankar, For Respondents : Mr.C.Godwin, ORDER This Petition is filed to condone the delay of of 1103 days in representing the appeal. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, owing to a lack of communication, the petitioner was unable to keep track of the proceedings, which resulted in a delay of 1103 days in filing the present appeal. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents raised a strong objection, contending that the petitioners have failed to satisfactorily explain the reasons for the delay. 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP(MD). No.10667 of 2025 4. Considering the fact that to give one more opportunity to the petitioner, this Petition is allowed and the delay of 1103 days is condoned on payment of cost of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand only) to the learned counsel for the respondent within one week from today. On production of receipt of such payment, the Registry is directed to number the second appeal, if the papers are otherwise in order and list the same for admission on 05.08.2026. 21.07.2026 LS 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP(MD). No.10667 of 2025 T.V.THAMILSELVI,J. LS ORDER IN CMP(MD) No.10667 of 2025 in SA(MD)No.SR19374 of 2022 Date : 21/07/2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis