222 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-1541-2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 15, 2025 Sukhdev Singh @ Sukha Singh … Appellant Versus Baljinder Singh …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- None. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) On the previous date of hearing, following order was passed:- "Appearance has been made on behalf of the respondent, but there is no representa#on on behalf of the appellant. However, it is no#ced that the ma%er is being listed today a'er long interregnum. In the interest of jus#ce, adjourned to 21.01.2025. No#ce to the appellant as well as his counsel be issued for the date fixed." 2. Today, it is reported by the Registry that no#ce was sent to the counsel for the appellant vide le%er dated 11.09.2024 and the same has been duly received by the counsel and even the appellant has received the no#ce, as reported by the Registry. 3. Despite above, nobody is pu4ng in appearance on behalf of the appellant, indica#ng that he is no longer interested in pursuing this appeal. Dismissed in default for want of prosecu#on. July 15, 2025 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No Sarita Rani 2025.07.15 18:01 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order