HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 1632 of 2025 Court No. - 86 HON'BLE NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Shri Janardan Yadav, learned counsel for the revisionist states that the revisionist does not want to press the present revision, and the same may be dismissed as not pressed. 2. In view of the statement made, the criminal revision is dismissed as not pressed. 3. Certified copy of the impugned order be returned to the revisionist as per rule after retaining a photostat copy of the same on the record. 4. Shri J.P. Rai, Advocate for the opposite party no.1 - Union of India, Shri Ashish Pandey, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 - NCB and the learned AGA are present. September 22, 2025 safi Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Janardan Yadav, Ram Jatan Yadav, Shyam Mohan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.) Vikram Sharma .....Revisionist(s) Union Of India And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MAHBOOB SAFI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad