Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8836 (AP)

Dasari Bhagyalakshmi, v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/5856/2020 · 2025-08-11

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010096332020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5856/2020 Between: 1. DASARI BHAGYALAKSHMI,, W/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED . 35 YEARS, OCC . HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO. 1-35-31, MALLADIVARI STREET, NAZARPET, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT AT GUNTUR. 3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TENALI TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. INSPECTOR OF POLICE, 1 TOWN POLICE STATION, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, 1 TOWN POLICE STATION, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. ALLURI SYAM SUNDAR, S/O. MOHAN, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 1-31-35, MALLADIVARI STREET, NAZAR PET, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 7. ALLURI ANURADHA, W/O. SYAM SUNDAR, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 1-31-35, MALLADIVARI STREET, NAZAR PET, 2 TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5856 of 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents particularly of 4th respondent in not registering crime on petitioner's complaints dt.19.01.2020 and 18.02.2020 submitted complaining against the criminal acts committed by the respondent Nos. 6 and 7 and their henchmen, in spite of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in LalithaKumari Vs Govt. of U.P and Others, as illegal, irregular, irrational, amounts to non-discharge of legal obligation conferred on them under the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents particularly the 5th respondent to register crime and prosecute the accused persons for appropriate offences and penal provisions of law by subjecting them for the process of arrest and judicial remand and pass…” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on instructions, would submit that the police have not registered any crime, on the information given by the petitioner, since no offence is made out. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of, with a liberty to the petitioner to work out her remedies before appropriate forum. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedies before the appropriate forum according to law. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 12.08.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.5856 of 2020 Dated.12.08.2025 UPS 166