Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 88316 (KAR)

SRI. D. VIRENDER VISHWANATH v. SRI. B. SURESH

WP/30023/2015 · 2025-10-13

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40390 WP No. 30023 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 30023 OF 2015 (L-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. D.VIRENDER VISHWANATH, SON OF SRI. D.V.VISHWANATH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, MUSGODU ESTATE, BALAGUNDA GROUP OF ESTATES, SOMWARPET -571 326, KODAGU. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. R.KIRAN, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: SRI. B.SURESH, SON OF BABU, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, WORKER, MUSGODU ESTATE, BALAGUNDA GROUP OF ESTATES, SOMWARPET -571 326. KODAGU. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. BHARATH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. M.A.APPAIAH, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40390 WP No. 30023 of 2015 ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. Sri.Bharath., counsel on behalf of Sri.M.A.Appaiah., for the respondent has appeared in person. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 10.10.2025, on that day, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the petitioner, it was ordered to be listed on 13.10.2025. It was also ordered that if none appears for the petition on the next date of hearing, the petition will be dismissed for non-prosecution. The petition is listed today. As already noted above, today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the petition is not interested in prosecuting the petition. In view of peremptory order dated 10.10.2025, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40390 WP No. 30023 of 2015 Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of and interim direction if any stands discharged. SD/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 58