Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8830 (PNJ)

OM PAL v. MAI RAM AND OTHERS

SAO/24/2025 · 2026-08-27

Harkesh Manuja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SAO No.24 of 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 142 OM PAL Vs MAI RAM AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Present: Mr. Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate Mr. Vansh Malhotra, Advocate HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to the dated 12.03.2025 whereby the judgment and decree dated 27.02.2020 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Kaithal was set aside and the matter was remanded back to the learned Trial Court It has been informed by learned counsel representing the parties that the suit which was ordered to be re vide decision dated 12.03.2025 In suc same is disposed of. However, the appellant would be at liberty to approach this Court again in case stand disposed of. August 27, 2026 Atik Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH SAO No.24 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Mr. Ishnoor Singh, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the appellant Mr. Vansh Malhotra, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to the dated 12.03.2025 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Kaithal, whereby the judgment and decree dated 27.02.2020 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Kaithal was set aside and the matter was remanded back to the learned Trial Court for deciding the matter afresh. It has been informed by learned counsel representing the parties that the suit which was ordered to be re-decided by the learned First Appellate Court vide decision dated 12.03.2025, stands dismissed for want of non In such circumstances, no cause survives in the present appeal, the same is disposed of. However, the appellant would be at liberty to approach this Court again in case the suit is revived. All pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 6 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH SAO No.24 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.08.2026 .......Appellant(s) ....Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA for the appellant(s). for respondent No.2. By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to the decision passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Kaithal, whereby the judgment and decree dated 27.02.2020 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Kaithal was set aside and the matter was remanded back to e matter afresh. It has been informed by learned counsel representing the parties that decided by the learned First Appellate Court , stands dismissed for want of non-prosecution. h circumstances, no cause survives in the present appeal, the same is disposed of. However, the appellant would be at liberty to approach this All pending application(s), if any, shall also (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE 1 decision passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Kaithal, whereby the judgment and decree dated 27.02.2020 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Kaithal was set aside and the matter was remanded back to It has been informed by learned counsel representing the parties that decided by the learned First Appellate Court h circumstances, no cause survives in the present appeal, the same is disposed of. However, the appellant would be at liberty to approach this All pending application(s), if any, shall also MOHMED ATIK 2026.08.27 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment