Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8830 (JHR)

ARVIND SHARMA v. AUTHORIZED OFFICER, PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK

WPC/1367/2024 · 2025-08-14

Rajesh Kumar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:23882 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.1367 of 2024 ---- Arvind Sharma, aged about 39 years, Son of Late Sarju Mistri, Resident of Bapu Nagar, Karmik Nagar, Saraidhella, P.O-ISM, P.S. Dhanbad, District-Dhanbad …. …. Petitioner -Versus- Authorized Officer, Punjab National Bank, Circle Shastra Center, Bokaro, Sector- 4, City Centre, P.O and P.S-Sector-4, District-Bokaro …. …. Respondent With W.P.(C) No.1366 of 2024 ---- M/s New Unique Coal Company, a proprietorship firm, having its office at Ghoramurga, P.O and P.S.-Govindpur, District-Dhanbad representing through its proprietor Arvind Sharma, aged about 39 years, son of late Sarju Mistri, Resident of Bapu Nagar, Karmik Nagar, Saraidhella, P.O-ISM, P.S-Dhanbad, District- Dhanbad …. …. Petitioner -Versus- Authorized Officer, Punjab National Bank, Circle Shastra Center, Bokaro, Sector- 4, City Centre, P.O and P.S-Sector-4, District-Bokaro …. …. Respondent ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioners : Mrs. Jasvindar Mazumdar, Advocate [in both the cases] For the Respondent-Bank : Mr. Parth S.A Swaroo Pati, Adv [in both the cases] ---- 07/Dated: 14th August, 2025 1. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the writ petitions have become infructuous and as such, she has instruction from their clients not to pursue the matters. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents has raised no objection. 3. Permission is granted. 4. In view of the above submission, present writ petitions are hereby, disposed of as infructuous. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Raja/- Uploaded