Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 88292 (KAR)

S. JAYARAMAIAH v. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

WP/2150/2023 · 2025-09-15

K V Aravind, S G Pandit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36627-DB WP No. 2150 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION No. 2150 OF 2023 (S-KSAT) BETWEEN: 1. S. JAYARAMAIAH, S/O LATE SAMPANAGAIAH AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS RETIRED RAILWAY POLICE SUB INSPECTOR R/AT No.YADAVANAHALLI VILLAGE, CHELURU POST, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT -562159. …PETITIONER (BY SRI T.C. HEMANTH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI MARUTHI S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, NRUPATUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU -560010. 2. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE RAILWAYS, 2ND FLOOR 'B' BLOCK, BMTC COMPLEX, Digitally signed by VINUTHA B S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36627-DB WP No. 2150 of 2023 K. H. ROAD, SHANTHI NAGAR, BENGALURU -560027. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT, OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT RAILWAY POLICE, BENGALURU RAILWAY CITY JUNCTION, KEMPEGOWDA MEJASTIC, BENGALURU -560023. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI V. SHIVAREDDY, AGA FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 20/07/2022 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE KARNATAKA STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL IN APPLICATION No.4517/2021. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT) Sri S. Maruthi, learned counsel for the petitioner, files a memo stating that the petition is rendered infructuous. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36627-DB WP No. 2150 of 2023 2. Memo is placed on record. 3. Writ petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. In view of the dismissal of the writ petition, pending interlocutory application, if any, also stands disposed of. Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE MV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33