Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8829 (UTT)

MAHESH DHIMAN v. DEVENDRA SINGH NEGI

CLCON/309/2025 · 2025-07-10

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:5959 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS CLCON/309/2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Saurabh Kumar Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Division Bench of this Court had requested the Joint Magistrate, Roorkee to look into the allegation made by petitioner in his representation regarding encroachment over the water body land. Alleging disobedience of the order passed by Division Bench, this contempt petition is filed. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that order passed by Division Bench was served upon Joint Magistrate on 27.02.2025; however, he has not taken any decision in the matter. 4. Before initiating contempt proceedings, this Court thinks that ends of justice would be met if petitioner is permitted to draw attention of Joint Magistrate to the order of this Court. 5. Accordingly, contempt petition is disposed of by permitting petitioner to make representation to Joint Magistrate. If he makes representation within two weeks from today, Joint Magistrate shall take necessary steps for compliance of the order passed by Division Bench, within four months. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 10.07.2025 Mahinder/ MAHINDER SINGH Digitally signed by MAHINDER SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=da6212e6e78d94ed3134842bc6a8d6ca168979ca7b8c2f 031a92d1a18b08923c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=AB77B7C5B240908B392BE84F5CDD4C2AF35DC46 26D305B1BC9EA4BABA43D2B8F, cn=MAHINDER SINGH Date: 2025.07.10 19:41:23 +05'30'