Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8829 (AP)

Komaravolu Venkata Sesha Saila Kumari v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/5976/2020 · 2025-09-10

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010095402020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5976/2020 Between: 1. KOMARAVOLU VENKATA SESHA SAILA KUMARI, W/O. HANUMANTHA RAO AGED 49 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURE, R/O. D.NO.1-10-78/A, RAJIVANGAR, STREET NO.2, KAVALI TOWN, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIATE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THASILDAR, JALADANKI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, JALADANKI, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. KETHIREDDY SIVA KUMAR REDDY, S/O.DASARADHARAMIREDDY BRUNDAVNAM HOUSING COLONY, KAVALAI, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V SATISH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. P RAJASEKHAR The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not registering the FIR on the report dated 28.12.2019 lodged by the petitioner despite the orders passed by this Hon-ble Court in WP.No. 2876 of 2020 dated 24.2.2020 is illegal and arbitrary and to consequently direct the 3rd respondent to register FIR on the report dated 28.12.2019 of the petitioner.” 2 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the disputes between the parties are purely civil in nature. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:11.09.2025 ASR 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.5976 of 2020 Dt.11.09.2025 Asr