Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 88283 (KAR)

SMT. K. MALINI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/23889/2025 · 2025-08-20

R Devdas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32429 WP No. 23889 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 23889 OF 2025 (KLR-LG) BETWEEN: SMT. K. MALINI W/O SAMBOJI RAO AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/AT HALLEPURA VILLAGE RAYARADODDI, HANUR TALUK CHAMARAJAURA DISTRICT-571443 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SIDDHARTH B. MUCHANDI., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING, BANGALORE 560001. 2. THE TAHSIDLAR HANUR TALUK CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT-571439. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMAD JAFFAR SHAH., AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2 CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 20/06/2025 AND TO GRANT THE ADJACENT LANDS IN SY.NO.312G MEASURING 33 CENTS AND SY.NO.312D MEASURING 16 CENTS AT HULLEPURA VILLAGE, HANUR HOBLI AND TALUK, CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT TO THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURE A AND ETC. Digitally signed by DHARMALINGAM Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32429 WP No. 23889 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for both the respondents. 2. The prayer in this writ petition is direct the 2nd respondent-Tahsildar, Hanur Taluk, Chamarajanagara District, to consider the representation given by the petitioner on 20.06.2025 to enable the consideration of the application said to have been filed at the hands of the petitioner for grant of 33 cents of land in Sy.No.312G and 16 cents of land in Sy.No.312D, both situated at Hullepura village, Hanuru Taluk, Chamarajanagara District. 3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the representation has been given by the petitioner in terms of Rule 4(2) of the Karnataka Land Grant Rules, 1969. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32429 WP No. 23889 of 2025 4. Having regard to the fact that the representation has been given by the petitioner recently, the 2nd respondent-Tahsildar is hereby directed to consider the representation and pass necessary orders in accordance with law. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. 5. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL CT: JL