MOHAMMAD AYUB @ AYUB AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/46192/2024 · 2025-05-08
Manisha Batra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 88280 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 88280 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-46192-2024(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 304 CRM-M-46192-2024(O&M) Date of Decision: 08.05.2025 MOHAMMAD AYUB @ AYUB AND OTHERS ....Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER ....Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present : Mr. Pushp Jain, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vivek Sharma, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Virat Rana, Advocate for respondent no.2 MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of FIR No.111 dated 30.07.2019 under Sections 342, 323, 506, 148, 149 of IPC (Sections 325, 379 of IPC added later on) registered at Police Station Kartarpur, District Jalandhar Rural and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 06.09.2024 (Annexure P-2). 2 . This Court vide order dated 21.03.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jalandhar and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has Deepak Patwal 2025.05.12 17:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-46192-2024(O&M) 2 submitted report dated 05.05.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No.111 dated 30.07.2019 under Sections 342, 323, 506, 148, 149 of IPC (Sections 325, 379 of IPC added later on) registered at Police Station Kartarpur, District Jalandhar Rural and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 06.09.2024 (Annexure P-2) are quashed qua the petitioners. ( MANISHA BATRA ) 08.05.2025 JUDGE Deepak Patwal
1.
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
2. Whether reportable : Yes/No Deepak Patwal 2025.05.12 17:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document