Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8828 (JK)

TARIQ AHMAD GOJREE AND ANR v. UMAR RASOOL KAWOOSA AND OTHERS

CM(M)/367/2025 · 2025-10-06

Rahul Bharti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No. 29 REGULAR CAUSE LIST HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CM(M) 367/2025 c/w CM(M) 388/2025 Tariq Ahmad Gojree & Anr. …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. G. A. Lone, Advocate. Vs. Umar Rasool Kawoosa & Others. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. B. A. Bashir, Senior Advocate with Ms. Falak Bashir, Advocate. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE. ORDER 06.10.2025 01. These two petitions filed under article 227 of the Constitution of India do not warrant any lengthy engagement for their adjudication as the same have come up from the end of the petitioners/judgment debtors upon seeing that their civil first appeal preferred against judgment and decree dated 28.06.2025 passed by the trial court of 3rd Civil Subordinate Judge (Forest Magistrate), Srinagar before the appellate court of learned 1st Additional District Judge, Srinagar is going to suffer loss of lis because of intervening execution of the impugned judgment and decree taking place, upon being denied the interim relief by the Appellate Court of 1st Additional District Judge, Srinagar. 02. When confronted, both counsel that these two petitions can be disposed of with a direction to the first appellate court to come up with a time bound adjudication of the civil first appeal, both counsel registered their accord. 03. Accordingly, these two petitions are disposed of with a direction to the learned 1st Additional District Judge, Srinagar to hear and dispose of the civil first appeal preferred by the petitioners/judgment debtors by or before 31.12.2025. In case, any extension of time beyond 31.12.2025 is to be solicited, then the same to be done by laying a proper motion with citing of reasons for inability to dispose of the matter within the time given. 04. In the meantime, till final adjudication of the civil first appeal of the petitioners/judgment debtors, status quo with respect to the suit shop/s shall remain in force. 05. Disposed of. 06. A copy of this order be placed on the record of each file. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE SRINAGAR: 06.10.2025 “HAMID” Serial No. 133 REGULAR CAUSE LIST HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CM(M) 15/2022 c/w i)CRM(M) 40/2020 ii)CRM(M) 5/2021 iii)CM(M) 103/2022 Sadaf Niyaz Shah. …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Azhar Ul Amin, Senior Advocate with Mr. Nomaan Shafi, Advocate. Vs. Syed Gh. Rabbani Shah & Anr. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Danish Majid Dar, Advocate. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE. ORDER 06.10.2025 01. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 02. Reserved for judgment. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE SRINAGAR: 06.10.2025 “HAMID”