Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 88270 (ALL)

SUDHAKAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/28410/2025 · 2025-08-21

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:144779 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 28410 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sudhakar Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayers: "Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.2/ Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Azamgarh, Mandal Azamgarh to decide the proceeding of Revision Case no.207/A, Computerized No. C-202115000001167 (Reema & others Vs. State of U.P. & others) under section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006, Village- Mauja-Chauki Khurd, Pargana & Tehsil- Sagri, District- Azamgarh, pending in the court of learned Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Azamgarh, Mandal Azamgarh, pending before it expeditiously within a period so stipulate Hon'ble Court." 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that proceedings under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 are pending consideration before respondent no.2. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the same. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or calling for a counter affidavit, the writ petition is disposed of requiring the respondent no.2 to decide the Revision Case No.207/A, Computerized No.C-202115000001167 (Reema & others Vs. State of U.P. & others) strictly in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, within two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. 4. It is made clear that the Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. Order Date :- 22.8.2025 CS/- Digitally signed by :- CHANDAN SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad