Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 88264 (ALL)

VARSHA SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/13271/2025 · 2025-09-07

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13271 of 2025 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard Mr. Navin Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Manvendra Singh, learned counsel for respondent nos.2 & 4 and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. The present writ petition has been filed with the prayer to direct the respondent no.2 to pass an appropriate order upon the pending online transfer application of the petitioners which they opted as well as further prayer to direct the respondent nos.2&3 to transfer the petitioners to the district of their preferences as opted by them in their respective online transfer application, strictly in accordance with the Government Order dated 23.05.2025, 05.06.2025 and 16.06.2025 forthwith. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners were appointed as Assistant Teachers in Primary Schools at Mahoba and applications have been given by the petitioners for considering their inter district transfer to the district of their preferences as opted by them in their respective online transfer application, but the applications have not been considered till date. Learned counsel for respondent nos.2&4 submits that he has no objection, in case, fresh representations are moved by the petitioners individually before the authorities concerned for redressal of their grievance, the same shall be considered in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioners, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that petitioners may make fresh applications/representations, individually, ventilating all their grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.2, i.e. Secretary, Basic Education Board, U.P., Prayagraj, within two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.2 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. September 8, 2025 Jitendra/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Navin Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Manvendra Singh (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Varsha Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad