2025:KER:29494 RP NO. 1227 OF 2024 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S. FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 14TH CHAITHRA, 1947 RP NO. 1227 OF 2024 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 09.10.2024 IN WA NO.599 OF 2024 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENT: TRIVANDRUM TENNIS CLUB REPRESENTED BY ITS HON. SECRETARY, SRI. MDS KUMARASWAMY AGED 64 YEARS, S/O. M.D.K. SUBRAMANIAM, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695003, RESIDING AT 'AMRITHAM' SPNRA-115(E) T.C.34/385/2, NEAR KRISHI BHAVAN A.R.R. SCHOOL ROAD, NETTAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695133 BY ADVS. K.ANAND BENNY ANTONY PAREL AMEER SALIM SUMEERA SUNDAR GEORGE POONTHOTTAM (SR.)(K/000570/1979) RESPONDENT ( S )/APPELLANTS : 1 STATE OF KERALA THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 2 THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 3 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, CIVIL STATION ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695043 2025:KER:29494 RP NO. 1227 OF 2024 2 4 THE TAHSILDAR THIRUVANANTHAPURAM FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695023 5 THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TAXES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 6 THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONERATE OF EXCISE, VIKAS BHAVAN P.O., NANDAVANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695033 7 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE EXCISE DIVISION OFFICE, FORT, ATTAKKULANGARA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695023 SR GP T K VIPINDAS THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: 2025:KER:29494 RP NO. 1227 OF 2024 3 O R D E R Amit Rawal, J. This review petition has been filed by a different instructing counsel. Though the instructing counsel in the previous matter was Shri.V.S.Sudhir, the matter was argued by a senior counsel. There is no bar with regard to appearance of a different senior counsel in the matter, but the instructing counsel has to be the same, in view of the judgment of Supreme Court in Tamil Nadu Electricity Board and Another v. N.Raju Reddiar and Another [(1997) 9 SCC 736]. In view of the judgment(supra), review petition filed by another instructing counsel is not maintainable. Petition stands dismissed. Sd/- AMIT RAWAL, JUDGE Sd/- EASWARAN S., JUDGE nak