RSA-5561- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 228 Vijay Kumar Jagat Parkash CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) concurrent judgments and decrees of suit filed by the plaintiff for permanent injunction was dismissed. issued way in default Court, whereafter, upon an application moved by the appellant, the main appeal was ordered to restored its original number vide order dated 27.09.2022. appellant, despite the case having been called twice. has exhibited an utterly casual attitude in litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the -2016 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA Date of Decision: Vijay Kumar Versus Jagat Parkash CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None for the appellant. Mr. Sanjay Vij, Advocate for the respondent NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The plaintiff-appellant is in second appeal against the concurrent judgments and decrees of both the Courts below filed by the plaintiff for permanent injunction was dismissed. The matter pertains to the year 2016. Perusal of the order-sheets reveals that issued way back on 26.10.2016. Thereafter the main appeal was dismissed in default vide order dated 17.09.2019 by a co Court, whereafter, upon an application moved by the appellant, the main appeal was ordered to restored its original number vide order dated .2022. Today again, there is no representation on behalf of the despite the case having been called twice. A bare reading of the above facts shows that the appellant exhibited an utterly casual attitude in litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-5561-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.03.2025 .… Appellant .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Sanjay Vij, Advocate for the respondent. in second appeal against the both the Courts below whereby the filed by the plaintiff for permanent injunction was dismissed. The matter pertains to the year 2016. sheets reveals that notice of motion was Thereafter the main appeal was dismissed vide order dated 17.09.2019 by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court, whereafter, upon an application moved by the appellant, the main appeal was ordered to restored its original number vide order dated representation on behalf of the despite the case having been called twice. A bare reading of the above facts shows that the appellant exhibited an utterly casual attitude in his pursuit of the present litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the in second appeal against the the of motion was Thereafter the main appeal was dismissed ordinate Bench of this Court, whereafter, upon an application moved by the appellant, the main appeal was ordered to restored its original number vide order dated representation on behalf of the pursuit of the present litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the RISHU KATARIA 2025.03.28 17:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-5561- Court has been expended in affording opportunities to interest of justice. O casual and careless approach. It is clear that counsel is Court is left with no other option except to prosecution. 25.03.2025 rishu -2016 (O&M) -2- Court has been expended in affording opportunities to interest of justice. On the other hand, the appellant l and careless approach. It is clear that seriously interested in pursuing the present matter. Thus, this Court is left with no other option except to prosecution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. .2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable Court has been expended in affording opportunities to the appellant in the n the other hand, the appellant has adopted an utterly l and careless approach. It is clear that neither the appellant nor his seriously interested in pursuing the present matter. Thus, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the same for non- Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No appellant in the adopted an utterly his seriously interested in pursuing the present matter. Thus, this RISHU KATARIA 2025.03.28 17:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.