IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Panna Lal State of Haryana CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. for the petitioner. Mr DEEPAK SIBAL Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Collector, Sonepat 19.03.2025 (Annexure 2. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. 3. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is dispose decision on the petitioner, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned, preferably within of this order. 4. Needless to add that the decision so taken be petitioner and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, be at liberty to challenge the same, in acco August 06, 202 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : Sr. No.125 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-22626- Date of Decision : Versus Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Roopak Bansal, Advocate, or the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Sonepat-respondent No.3 to take a decision on the (Annexure P-8), made on behalf of the petitioner. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. decision on the representation dated 19.03.2025 (Annexure P , by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned, preferably within two months from the date of receipt of a copy Needless to add that the decision so taken be and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT -2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 06.08.2025 …Petitioner …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the to take a decision on the representation dated ), made on behalf of the petitioner. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the d of with a direction to respondent No.3 to take a (Annexure P-8), submitted by the , by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing from the date of receipt of a copy Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, he would rdance with law. DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2025.08.08 13:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document