Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Gujarat · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8823 (GUJ)

PARESH KANUBHAI PATEL v. BHARTI SUJITKUMAR TIWARI

CR.MA/14659/2025 · 2025-10-09

R T Vachhani

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

R/CR.MA/14659/2025 ORDER DATED: 09/10/2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 14659 of 2025 In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 25732 of 2025 ========================================================== PARESH KANUBHAI PATEL Versus BHARTI SUJITKUMAR TIWARI & ANR. ========================================================== Appearance: BHARATKUMAR A DESAI(8513) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 DS AFF.NOT FILED (N) for the Respondent(s) No. 1 MR. NIRAJ SHARMA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 2 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. T. VACHHANI Date : 09/10/2025 ORAL ORDER 1. By way of filing the present application seeking to condone the delay of 250 days in preferring the Criminal Revision Application challenging the order dated 16.07.2024 passed by the learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Vadodara in Criminal Appeal No.130 of 2023 whereby learned Sessions Judge has confirmed the order dated 02.07.2022 passed by 19th Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vadodara in Criminal Case No.1872 of 2015. 2. The learned advocate Mr. Mangal v. Gadhavi appeared on behalf of respondent No.1 has submitted his no objection if this Court may allow the present application. 3. Reverting back to the case on hand, considering the contention made in the application, though no plausible R/CR.MA/14659/2025 ORDER DATED: 09/10/2025 reasons explaining the huge delay of 250 days have been put forward for not filing the revision application in time, however, considering no objection of the respondent; without much delving into the merits of the case, the huge delay of 250 days in filing the revision application is condoned; subject to the payment of cost of Rs.15,000/- within a period of 7 days, before the Registry of this Court. 4. The Registry is directed to assign a regular number to the captioned revision application and to list the matter in its regular course subject to the production of the receipt as directed hereinabove. Failure to comply with the above directions shall render this order inoperative and shall not preclude the concerned Court from proceeding further with the matter in accordance with law. (R. T. VACHHANI, J) NITIN MAKWANA Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: NITIN INDRAVADAN MAKWANA(HCW0110), ENGLISH STENOGRAPHER GRADE I, at High Court of Gujarat on 10/10/2025 11:10:46