Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 88223 (KAR)

SRINIVAS V v. MAHESH S T

CRL.RP/949/2024 · 2025-12-11

Ravi V Hosmani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53713 CRL.RP No. 949 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 949 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRINIVAS V S/O VENKAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS OCC BUSINESS, NO.2578 VIMALESHWARA NILAYA MCC A BLOCK, 2ND FLOOR, 5TH MAIN, 5TH CROSS, MACHIDEVA SAMUDAYA BHAVANA ROAD, BESIDE VISHWANATHA PHOTO STUDIO DAVANAGERE- 577 002 …PETITIONER (BY SMT. BABY UADAV, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. HIREMATHAD MAHESHIAH RUDRAYYA., ADVOCATE) AND: MAHESH S T S/O THIPPANNA S AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST RESIDENT OF CHIKKABUDIHALA DAVANAGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. S G RAJENDRA REDDY., ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S. 397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 16.01.2024 IN CRL.A.NO.62/2023 PASSED BY THE I ADDL. DIST. AND SESSIONS JUDGE, DAVANAGERE CONSEQUENTLY Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53713 CRL.RP No. 949 of 2024 SETTING ASIDE OF THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 16.06.2023 IN C.C.NO.2641 OF 2020 PASSED BY THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, DAVANAGERE AND FOR PASSING OF SUCH OTHER OR DIRECTION., AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER Matter is listed for consideration of I.A.no.1/2024 filed for condonation of 92 days' delay in filing Revision Petition. 2. Smt.Baby Yadav, learned counsel appearing for Sri Hiremathad Maheshaiah Rudrayya, learned counsel for petitioner submits that mis-placed file is not yet traced and seeks further time. 3. It is seen that on said ground petitioner had earlier sought for an adjournment and same was granted. 4. Learned counsel for respondent is present and submits that after obtaining interim order and failing to comply with same, petitioner has been dragging on with matter. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53713 CRL.RP No. 949 of 2024 5. Above submission would indicate that petitioner is not diligently pursuing this Revision Petition. Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. In view of disposal of petition, pending interlocutory application stands disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20