APHC010095572002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 20542/2002 Between: 1. N LAILA KUMAR, KRISHNA DISTRICT., W/O. LATE M.CHANDRASEKHARA RAO, C/O. G.RAVI SHANKER, S/O. G.V.SUBBA RAO, CHJODAVARAM (VIA), PENAMALURU, ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION HYDERABAD, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD. 2. THE SECRETARY CORRESPONDENT, KAKRAPATHI BHAVANNARAYANA COLLEGE, VIJAYAWADA. 3. THE PRINCIPAL, KAKRAPATHI BHAVANNARAYANA COLLEGE, VIJAYAWADA. 4. ACCOUNTANT GENERAL A E, ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the respondents herein to fix and release the pension in the revised U.G.C. scales of pay, 1996 and to pay the same forthwith arrears and gratuity and other benefits flow as per the rules with interest at 12% per annum from 1-10-1999 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2002(WPMP 25734 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein to release the pension in the revised U.G.C. scales of pay, 1996 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2008(WPMP 32986 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to fix an early date for hearing of the WP No. 20542/2002, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. B KRISHNA MOHAN (ASST SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA)- 20370/AP/308/1989 2. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 3. HARINATH N (DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA) The Court made the following order: Sri Sazid Kallur, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in this writ petition no longer survives and this writ petition became infructuous and hence prayed to dismiss the writ petition. 2. In view of the submission so made this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI BRS