'I IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 5238 OF 2025 Between: Putchalapally Abhishek, S/o. P. Sudheer Reddy, aged about 30 years, R/o; Tallapalem Village, Kavali Mandal, SPSR Nellore District ...PETITIONERS AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Hc^e Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District 2. The Superintendent of Police, SPSR Nellore [district, Nellore 3. The Circle Inspector of Police, Kavali Rural P.S, Kavali, SPSR Nellore District 4. The Sub Inspector of Police, Kavali Rixfal P.S, Kavali, SPSR Nellore District 5. Chalamcherla Srinivasulu Reddy, S/o. Rosi Reddy, aged about 60 years, R/o. Tallapalem Village, Kavali Mandal, SPSR Nellore District ...RESPONDENTS^^ Petition under Article ^2^of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd and 4th respon^nt police in directing th^etitioner not to enterjn to his lands (Ac. 10.32 cents in Sy.No. 437/1, 436/IB and 436/1A of Thallapalem Gram Panchayat, Kavali Mandal, SPSR Nellore District) m wherein he has raised paddy crop at the instance of 5th respondent inspite of petitioner obtaining favourable interim orders in SA No^209/2020 pending before this Hon’ble Court, as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Article 14 & 19(g) of the Constitution of India and consequently forbear the respondent police from interfering in civil disputes. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd and 4th respondent not to interfere/prevent the petitioner from entering in to his lands (Ac. 10.Scents in Sy.No. 437/1,436/IB and 436/1A of Thallapalem Gram Panchayat,Kavali Mandal, SPSR Nellore District) at the instance of 5th respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K RATHANGA PANI REDD>^ Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.5: —- The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010096242025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 5238 OF 2025 Between: Putchalapally Abhishek ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri K.Rathanga Pani Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: Ld. Govt. Pleader for Home The Court made the following order: ...RESPONDENT(S) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondents 3 and 4 are trying to interfere in the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and the 5‘^ respondent. The learned counsel further submits that the petitioner has filed S.A. No.209 of 2020 against the 5*^ respondent, and this Court granted interim stay on 18.08.2020. Though this Court has granted a stay of the operation of the judgment and decree in A.S. No. 18 of 2018 on the file of the Senior ! i i -2- W.P. No.5238 of 2025 Civil Judge, Kavali, the respondents 3 and 4, at the behest of the respondent, pressurizing the petitioner to settle the disputes. The learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that one N.Prasad Reddy, the brother-in-law of the 5*^ respondent, has filed a complaint against the petitioner before the Station House Officer, Kavali rural police station, alleging that the petitioner threatening him regarding the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and the 5*'^ respondent. The police have advised the complainant to redress the issue concerned before the Civil Court and closed the 3. complaint as it is civil in nature. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 to 4, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing respondents 3 and 4 not to interfere with the civil dispute between the petitioner and the respondent. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off. No costs. 4. 5. 6. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall MPRABHA^RRAO N OFFICER stand closed. Sd/- assistant n //true copy// SECT District , p g Kavali Rural P S 4. The sub inspector of Police, ^ 7. Three CD Copies To Kavali, SPSR Nellore TF f V' HIGH COURT DATED:04/03/2025 ORDER WP.No.5238 of 2025 * 2 0 MAR 2025 . Current becuon . ^ o mi Co; DISPOSING OF THE W.P., WITHOUT COSTS