Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 88193 (KAR)

SMT. SHANAZ BEGUM v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/7639/2023 · 2025-10-15

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40778 WP No. 7639 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.7639 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SHANAZ BEGUM W/O. LATE RAHAMATHULLA KHAN, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT NO. 19, ANDANAPPA BLOCK, 3RD CROSS, 5TH MAIN, RAHAMATH NAGAR, R.T. NAGAR POST, BENGALURU -560 032. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DHANANJAYA C.P., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DISTRICT, BENGALURU. Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40778 WP No. 7639 of 2023 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE NORTH SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU. 4. THASILDAR (ADDITIONAL) BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU -560 064. 5. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER YALAHANKA TALUK PANCHAYATH, YALAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU -560 064. 6. THE PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER VADEERAHALLI GRAMA PANCHAYATH, YALAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU -560 064. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO WITHDRAW THE LETTER DATED 24.11.2022 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.4 AND TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS MADE BY THE PETITIONER'S SON DATED 01.02.2023 TO THE RESPONDENTS NO.2 AND 4 THE COPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-F AND G AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.5 TO ENTER THE PETITIONER NAME IN THE KHATHA BOOK AS PER THE HAKKU PARTA OF THE PETITIONER AS MENTIONED IN ANNEXURE-C. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40778 WP No. 7639 of 2023 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER No representation on behalf of the petitioner. The office objections have not been complied with for the seventh time. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4