Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 88192 (PNJ)

M/S BHANDARI BROTHERS v. AJOY KUMAR SINHA AND OTHERS

COCP/3904/2025 · 2025-09-17

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-3904 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 224 M/s Bhandari Brothers Ajoy Kumar Sinha and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. dated 20.02.2019 ‘M/s Bhandari Brothers others’, whereby it was directed petitioner shall not be disconnected’ 2. fairly submits that the electricity connection of the petitioner restored, however, by the Division Bench of this Court in LPA Bhandari Brothers is accordingly submit the same may be disposed of as 3. 3904-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP Date of Decision: 1 M/s Bhandari Brothers Versus Ajoy Kumar Sinha and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Manu K. Bhandari, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Anu Chatrath, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dhamanpreet Kaur, Advocate for the respondents. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order 20.02.2019 (Annexure P-1) passed M/s Bhandari Brothers vs. Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. and whereby it was directed that ‘the electricity sup petitioner shall not be disconnected’. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits that the electricity connection of the petitioner restored, however, only in pursuance to the order dated by the Division Bench of this Court in LPA Bhandari Brothers vs. Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. and others is accordingly submitted that nothing survives in the present petition and the same may be disposed of as not pressed. Heard. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3904-2025 Date of Decision: 17.09.2025 .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Manu K. Bhandari, Advocate for the petitioner. Anu Chatrath, Senior Advocate with Kaur, Advocate for the respondents. The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order 1) passed in CWP-4523-2019, titled as Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. and ‘the electricity supply to the At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits that the electricity connection of the petitioner has been the order dated 13.08.2025 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in LPA-2360-2025, titled as ‘M/s Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. and others’. It that nothing survives in the present petition and not pressed. The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order titled as Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. and ply to the At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner very has been passed M/s . It that nothing survives in the present petition and RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.18 15:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-3904 4. petitioner as noted above and the present petition is hereby 5. 6. 17.09.2025 rishu 3904-2025 -2- In view of the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner as noted above, no further direct and the present petition is hereby disposed of, Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .09.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable submissions of learned counsel for the , no further direction is required to be passed; disposed of, as not pressed. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No submissions of learned counsel for the is required to be passed; RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.18 15:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.