Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 88192 (ALL)

FAARHAT v. UNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/28387/2025 · 2025-08-21

Kshitij Shailendra, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:144709-DB Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 28387 of 2025 Petitioner :- Faarhat Respondent :- Union Of India And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohammad Fahad Ansari,Quazi Mohammad Akaram,Ziauddin Farooqui Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.,Mahendra Pratap Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri P.N.Rai, learned Senior Counsel for the respondent no. 1, Sri Devesh Vikram, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State- respondents and Sri Sudhanshu Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4. 2. In pith and substance, the grievance of the petitioner is that Case No. D202305310001125 (Faarhat v. Union of India and others), under Section 3G(5) of the National Highway Act, 1956 pending before the second respondent may be decided expeditiously. 3. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel fairly states that in case the aforementioned case is pending consideration, the same will be considered and decided expeditiously by the Authority concerned. 4. In the facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and with the consent of the parties, the writ petition is disposed of finally with the direction to the second respondent to decide the aforementioned case of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously from the date of production of a copy of this order before him but certainly after affording opportunity to all stakeholders in the matter. Order Date :- 22.8.2025 A.K.Srivastava Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad