HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 28367 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. Sri Pankaj Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner states that no cause of action survives in the writ petition and same has become infructuous. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. October 8, 2025 Sattyarth Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Aditya Kumar Singh, C.S.C. (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Ravindra Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad