INTAZAR HUSAIN AND ANOTHER v. UNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/28777/2025 · 2025-09-07
Prashant Kumar, Saurabh Dwivedi Registrar J Cpc
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 88184 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 88184 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 28777 of 2025 Court No. - 39 HON'BLE ARINDAM SINHA, J.
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. Mrs. Archana Singh, learned advocate appears on behalf of respondent no. 2 (the oil company). She hands up communication dated 4th September, 2025 made by her client to petitioner, rejecting his application for the dealership. She submits, lease executed subsequent to the application was furnished but under the guidelines in the brochure it cannot be accepted.
2. Mr. Rajnish Kumar Srivastava, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and on instruction submits, his client intends to challenge the rejection.
3. The writ petition has become infructuous by subsequent event. It is dismissed. (Arindam Sinha,J.) , (Prashant Kumar,J.) September 8, 2025 Bhanu Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajnish Kumar Srivastava, Siddharth Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Archana Singh, Manoj Kumar Singh
Intazar Husain And Another .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- BHANU PRATAP KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad