- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53506-DB RP No. 169 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI REVIEW PETITION NO.169 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SMT. SAROJA PATIL W/O. SHASHIKANTH MUGALI, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, WORKING AS ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD SOUTH SUB-DIVISION, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, K.R. CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560 001. RESIDING AT 'HSG SURYA', NO.239, 15TH MAIN, B.S.K. II STAGE, BENGALURU-560 070. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANAT KUMAR HALKUR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. AJAY KADKOL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, COMMUNICATIONS AND BUILDING (SOUTH), PWD ANNEXE BUILDING, K.R. CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560 001. 3. SRI. GAJENDRA L FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, WORKING AS TECHNICAL ASSISTANT YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Digitally signed by YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Date: 2025.12.17 10:27:59 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53506-DB RP No. 169 of 2025 (MONITORING CELL), OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER, COMMUNICATIONS AND BUILDING (SOUTH), PWD ANNEXE BUILDING, K.R. CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE SERVED) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO PASS AN ORDER REVIEWING THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT DATED 15.11.2024 PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN WP.NO.26625 OF 2025 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT) This review petition filed under Order 47 Rule 1 and 2 of Code of Civil Procedure is directed against order dated 15.11.2024 in writ petition No.26625/2024. 2. Heard learned counsel Sri.Sanat Kumar Halkur through video conference and perused the entire review petition papers. The petitioner was before the Tribunal in Application No.3900/2024, questioning the order of transfer under notification dated 31.07.2024 (Annexure-C). The Tribunal under impugned order rejected the prayer of the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53506-DB RP No. 169 of 2025 petitioner, against which, the petitioner was before this Court in the above stated writ petition. 3. This Court under impugned order dated 15.11.2024, dismissed the application of the petitioner holding that no prejudice is caused to the petitioner, since, the petitioner is transferred from one table to another table in the same building. 4. Review could be entertained only if error on the face of the order is pointed out. In the present petition, the petitioner has failed to point out any error so as to exercise review jurisdiction. There is no merit in the review petition and accordingly, the petition stands rejected. 5. Since, the review petition is dismissed, the question of considering I.A.No.1/2025 would not arise. SD/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE SD/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE RKM, CT:PA List No.: 19 Sl No.: 1