Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 88175 (ALL)

RISHI GYANESH v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER

A227/9452/2025 · 2025-08-21

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:144466 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 9452 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rishi Gyanesh Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Ankit Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. This petition has been filed challenging the ex-parte interim injunction order passed by the trial court. 3. The petitioner claims to be aggrieved by the order though he is not defendant in the suit. 4. In case, the petitioner is aggrieved, he may approach the court below who has granted the interim injunction by filing application under Order 39 Rule 4 C.P.C. for setting-aside the order impugned and in case, petitioner is not a party, he can also move an application for impleadment in the suit. 5. In case, the petitioner moves application for impleadment as well as application under Order 39 Rule 4 C.P.C., the same shall be considered and decided by the court below, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of filing of the applications, after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. 6. With the aforesaid direction, this petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 22.8.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad