Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010048812025
2025:GAU-AS:2781
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/243/2025 MAJIBUR RAHMAN S/O LATE ABDUL KADIR, RESIDENT OF 2 NO. BONGALBORI, DIST MORIGAON ASSAM, 782410 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : TAWHID ALOM LASKAR, A BORBHUYAN,MR. D K AGARWALA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
ORDER Date : 17.03.2025 Heard learned counsel Mr.T.A.Laskar for the applicant Majibur Rahman who has filed this application for impleading necessary party in the connected AB/27/2025. It is submitted that earlier POCSO Act was not included in the case and
Page No.# 2/2 the informant was also not made a necessary party. Now, during the course of investigation, POCSO Act has been added and the informant is to be made a party as respondent No.2 in the connected AB/27/2025. Heard learned Addl.Public Prosecutor Mr. R.R.Kaushik for the respondent State. Considering the submissions at the Bar, the informant is allowed to be arrayed as the respondent No.2 in connected AB/27/2025. The applicant to file the amended Cause Title. In terms of the above observation, this interlocutory application stands
disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant