GHANSHYAM AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS
CRLP/18446/2025 · 2025-09-07
Abdul Shahid, Siddhartha Varma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 88158 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 88158 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18446 of 2025 Court No. - 43 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
HON'BLE ABDUL SHAHID, J.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners upon being confronted as to why civil suit was not being filed, prayed that the writ petition be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to take recourse to such action in law as might be available.
2. Learned AGA has no objection to the dismissal of the writ petition and also to the granting of the liberty.
3. Under such circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty prayed for. September 8, 2025 vijay krishna Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Indra Dev Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Abdul Shahid,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Ghanshyam And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KRISHNA JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad