Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 88148 (KAR)

MANIKANTA N., v. STATE BY SOLADEVANAHALLI POLICE STATION

CRL.P/8818/2025 · 2025-08-01

Mohammad Nawaz

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29952 CRL.P No. 8818 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8818 OF 2025 BETWEEN: MANIKANTA N., S/O. SRINIVASA. P, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/AT NO. 598, VADERAHALLI VILLAGE, VIDYARANYAPURA POST, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU-560 097. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAKASHA K V.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE BY SOLADEVANAHALLI POLICE STATION BENGALURU DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. SRI. RAMAN S/O. KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT NO. 372, NOOR JAN GARDEN, LAKSHMIPURA, VIDYARANYAPURA POST, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU-560 097. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.NAGESWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R1 R2 SERVED) Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29952 CRL.P No. 8818 of 2025 THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 CR.PC (FILED U/S 483 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO ENLARGE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.107/2025 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S 173(2),64 OF BNS A/W SEC.4 AND 6 OF POCSO ACT, 2012 REGISTERED BY SOLADEVANAHALLI POLICE, BANGALORE CITY, PENDING ON THE FILE OF HONBLE CJM BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT BANGALORE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ ORAL ORDER Petitioner has preferred this petition under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 praying to enlarge him on bail in Crime No.107/2025 of Soladevanahalli Police Station registered for the offence punishable under Section 137(2) of the BNS, 2023. 2. The learned Additional SPP submits that charge sheet has been filed in this case for offences under Section 137(2), 64(2)(m) of BNS, 2023 and Section 5(l) and 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, after filing of charge sheet, petitioner has not approached - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29952 CRL.P No. 8818 of 2025 the Sessions Court and therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition before the Sessions Court. 4. In the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge, it is observed that in this case, investigation is not yet completed and such being the case, grant of bail to the petitioner may result in tampering the prosecution witnesses and therefore, no grounds are made out by the petitioner to grant bail. 5. In view of filing of charge sheet and considering the submissions of the learned counsel for petitioner, petition is dismissed as withdrawn, reserving liberty as sought for. Sd/- (MOHAMMAD NAWAZ) JUDGE LDC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25