1 2025:CGHC:39093 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1195 of 2020 1 - Rakesh Kumar Bhatnagar S/o Late Ramavtar Bhatnagar, Aged About 63 Years R/o Behind Kosa Center, Sardar Darshan Singh Marg, Dr. Shyama Prasad Mukharji Ward, Kumharpara, Jagadalpur, District Jagadalpur, Chhattisgarh, District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department Mantralay Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Police Station Rakhi, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Joint Director, Office Of Divisional Joint Director Treasury, Accounts And Pension, Bastar Division, Bastar Chhattisgarh, District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh 3 - Block Education Officer, Block Chhindgarh, District Sukuma Chhattisgarh., District : Sukuma, Chhattisgarh 4 - Accountant General, Accountant General Office Zero Point, Balauda Bazar Road, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Branch Manager, State Bank Of India, Central Pension Procedure Center Govindpura, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, District : Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 6 - Branch Manager, State Bank Of India, Government Business Branch Jali Stambh Chowk, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.08.06 17:38:11 +0530 2 (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Ram Narayan Sahu, Advocate For State/Respondent No.1 to 3 : Mr. Rajeev Bharat, Govt. Advocate For Respondent No.4 : Mr. Rajkumar Gupta, Advocate. For Respondent No.5 & 6 : Mr. P. R. Patankar, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order on Board 06/08/2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondent No.5 & 6, who is main contesting party in the instant petition would submit that all the grievances of the petitioner has already been redressed and the petitioner is being paid regular pension. An arrears of the pension has been credited in his account on 29.02.2020, therefore, this petition become infructuous. 2. On the previous date of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to seek instructions in respect of aforesaid contention. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the party is not in his contact. 4. In view of above contention made by the respondent No.5 & 6, this instant petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Ravi Mandavi