MARYANN KUNNATHUPARAMBIL JOSE v. JOS THOMAS PALLATH
Tr.P(C)/763/2024 · 2025-04-02
Basant Balaji
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8812 (KER) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8812 (KER) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 12TH CHAITHRA, 1947 TR.P(C) NO. 763 OF 2024 OP (DIV) No.1696/2024, FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM PETITIONER:
MARYANN KUNNATHUPARAMBIL JOSE AGED 38 YEARS D/O JOS K. THOMAS, KUNNATHUPARAMBIL HOUSE, SURABHI NAGAR, KURUDIKKAD, PUDUSSERY (POST), PALAKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT,, PIN - 678623 BY ADV P.K.MOHANAN(PALAKKAD) RESPONDENT:
JOS THOMAS PALLATH AGED 40 YEARS S/O ALBERT NELSON, PALLATH HOUSE, SOUTH KUMBALANGI, KUMBALANGI VILLAGE, KOCHI, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682007 THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
TR.PC 763/2024 -2- 2025:KER:29355 O R D E R (Dated this the 2 nd day of April, 2025)
This Transfer Petition has been filed seeking a transfer of OP.(Div) No.1696/2024, pending before the Family Court, Ernakulam, to the Family Court, Palakkad. 2. The petitioner and the respondent are wife and husband. Their marriage was on 28.04.2012, and in the wedlock, they have two children. Due to ill-treatment and domestic violence caused to the petitioner by the respondent, their marital relationship became strained. The petitioner filed M.C. 336/2024 under Section 147 of BNSS, before the Family Court, Palakkad, against the respondent for maintenance of the minor children. In the meanwhile, the respondent filed O.P. 1696 of 2024 before the Family Court, Ernakulam, for divorce. 3. The case of the petitioner is that she is a working lady, and the minor children are with her. The younger child, aged 6 years, is suffering from autism. It is submitted
TR.PC 763/2024 -3- 2025:KER:29355 that the Family Court, Ernakulam, is situated at a distance of more than 150 kms away from the residence of the petitioner, and being a lady and mother of two minor children, it is difficult for her to travel from Palakkad to Ernakulam to contest the matter, and there is no one to accompany the petitioner to the Family Court, Ernakulam. In such circumstances, she prays for a transfer. 4. Notice issued from this Court has been served on the respondent, and none appeared. Thus, it can be seen that the averments in the Transfer Petition stand unchallenged, which entitles the petitioner an order from this Court. 5.
Moreover, the law in respect of transfer of proceedings, particularly in matrimonial disputes, is no longer res-integra, in view of the categoric declaration of law by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sumitha Singh v. Kumar Sanjay and another [(2001)10 SCC 41)], Mona Aresh Goel v. Aresh Satya Goel [(2000) 9 SCC 255], Vaishali Shridhar Jagtap v.
TR.PC 763/2024 -4- 2025:KER:29355 Shridhar Vishwanath Jagtap [AIR 2016 SC 3584] and Santhini v. Vijaya Venkatesh [2017 (4) KLT 415 (SC)]; wherein it is held that it is the convenience of the woman and children that have to be looked into while ordering the transfer of a case from one court to another. The law is quite categoric, and the wife's convenience has to be looked into while deciding a petition for transfer, and in such cases, transfer has been effected. 6. Thus, in the light of the uncontroverted averments in the memorandum of Transfer Petition, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and the inconvenience of the petitioner, and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the afore-cited decisions, I am inclined to allow this transfer petition. In the result, O.P (Div) No.1696/2024, before the Family Court, Ernakulam, is withdrawn and transferred to the Family Court, Palakkad. The Family Court, Ernakulam, shall
TR.PC 763/2024 -5- 2025:KER:29355 immediately transfer the records to the Family Court, Palakkad. On receipt of the records, the Family Court, Palakkad, shall issue notice to the parties and dispose of the case in accordance with law. Sd/- BASANT BALAJI JUDGE JS
TR.PC 763/2024 -6- 2025:KER:29355 APPENDIX OF TR.P(C) 763/2024 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure 1 TRUE COPY OF M.C. 336/2024 ON THE FILE OF FAMILY COURT, PALAKKAD DATED 23.10.2024 FILED BY THE PETITIONER ON BEHALF OF HER MINOR CHILDREN AGAINST THE RESPONDENT Annexure 2 TRUE COPY OF FORM 8 NOTICE RECEIVED FROM THE FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM DATED 28.09.2024