Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8812 (GAU)

NABIN CHANDRA BORAH v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 10 ORS

WP(C)/1369/2023 · 2025-06-15

Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010048832023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1369/2023 NABIN CHANDRA BORAH S/O LATE DEBEN CHANDRA BORAH, R/O BELTOLA BAZAR, NEAR SONALI PATH, GUWAHATI, DIST-KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN-781028 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 10 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS, BOARDS, ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006 2:THE GAUHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER PANBAZAR GUWAHATI-781001 3:THE MAYOR GAUHATI MUNCIPAL CORPORATION PANBAZAR GUWAHATI-781001 4:THE GAUHATI METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN BHANGAGAR STATE FED BUILDING GUWAHATI-781032 5:THE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER GAUHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION PANBAZAR GUWAHATI-781001 Page No.# 2/3 6:THE REGIONAL POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD ASSAM BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI-781021 7:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KAMRUP (M) GUWAHATI-781005 ASSAM 8:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE WEST ZONE JALUKBARI GUWAHATI-781012 9:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT (ROADS) CHANDMARI GUWAHATI-781003 ASSAM 10:THE CIRCLE OFFICER GUWAHATI REVENUE CIRCLE ULUBARI GUWAHATI-781007 11:THE OFFICER-N-CHARGE JALUKBARI POLICE STATION JALUKBARI GUWAHATI-78101 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H BARUAH, MR P P PHUKAN,MR P BORAH Advocate for the Respondent : SC, GMC, SC, PWD ROAD,SC, PCB,GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 16.06.2025 None appears for the petitioner on call whereas Ms. H. Baruah, learned counsel for the GMC as well as Shri S. Baruah, learned Standing Counsel, PCB for the respondent no. 6 and Shri BJ Talukdar, learned Senior Counsel for the Page No.# 3/3 respondent nos. 7, 8, 10 & 11 are present. Even on the last occasion i.e. 11.12.2024, when this matter was called upon, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. For ready reference, the order passed on 11.12.2024 is extracted hereinbelow- “None appears for the petitioner on call also on 07.06.2024 and 03.05.2024 none appears for the petitioner. Mr. P. Nayak, learned Standing Counsel appears for the respondent GMC. Matter to be listed after three weeks.” It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue this case and the same is dismissed for non-prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant