'A IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 5223 OF 2025 Between: 1. Bandi @ Vandikar Sarala, W/o. (Late) Muna Swamy, Aged 50 years, Occ; House Wife, R/o. Door No 280/A, East Colony, Railway Quarters, Renigunta Tirupati District, erstwhile Chittoor District. 2. Bandi @ Vandikar Subramanyam, S/o. (Late) Muna Swamy, Aged 26 years, Occ: Student, R/o. Door No 280/A, East Colony, Railway Quarters, Renigunta Tirupati District, erstwhile Chittoor District. 3. Bandi @ Vandikar Muni Divya, D/o. (Late) Muna Swamy, Aged 28 years, Occ: Student, R/o. Door No 280/A, East Colony, Railway Quarters, Renigunta, Tirupati District, erstwhile Chittoor District. ...PETITIONER’S AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati Guntur District, Home AP. 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati Guntur District, AP. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati District, Tirupati, 4. The District Collector, Tirupati District, Tirupati, Erstwhile Chittoor District 5. The Station House Officer, Renigunta Police Station, Tirupati District, Erstwhile Chittoor District. . 6. The Tahsildar, Renigunta, Tirupati District, Erstwhile Chittoor District. Renigunta / 7. Sai Chaitanya Real Estates, Tirupati, Rep by its Managing Partner, Dampuru Bhaskar, S/o Srinivasulu, Aged about 53 years, Occ; Business, R/o Door No 8-113, Royal Cheruvu Road, Tirupati Town, Tirupati District, Erstwhile Chittoor District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the respondents 5 and 6 in interfering the petitioners peaceful possession enjoying the property an extent Acl-99 cents in Survey No 940/2D in Tukivakam Village, Renigunta Mandal, Tirupati District without following due process of law is as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and violative of the fundamental right guaranteed to the petitioners under Article 19, 21, 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 5**^ to respondents not to interfere in peaceful possession and enjoying the property an extent of Ac 1.99 cents in Survey No. 940/2D in Tukivakam Village, Renigunta Mandal, Tirupati District. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 5‘^ to 7*" respondents not to interfere with the petitioners rights over the Property an extent of Ac. 1.99 cents in survey No.940/2D of Tukivakam Village, Renigunta Mandal, Tirupati District, without following due process of law, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner :SRI. CHAKRAVARTHY P V S K Counsel for the Respondent No’s: 1, 3 & 5: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No’s. 2, 4 & 6: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.7: — The Court made the following ORDER; ^^APHCOI0096292025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 5223 OF 2025 Between: ...PETITIONERS Bandi @ Vandikar Sarala and Others AND ...RESPONDENTS The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioners: 1. Sri Chakravarthy P.V.S.K. Counsel for the Respondents: 1. Ld. Govt. Pleader for Home 2. Ld. Govt. Pleader for Revenue The Court made the following order: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners’ are in peaceful possession and enjoyment of Ac. 1.99 cehts in Sy. No.940/2D in Tukivakam Village, Renigunta Mandal, Tirupati District. The learned counsel further submits that the subject property is the ancestral property of the petitioners and -2- W.P. No.5223 of 2025 /A that they are in continuous possession and enjoyment. However, respondents 5 & 6 are interfering with the peaceful possession of the petitioners. The learned counsel submits that 5^^ respondent, at the instigation of respondents 6 and 7, repeatedly calling the petitioners to the police station without any crime being registered against them. 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents 1 to 5, on written instructions, submits that the schedule property falls under the jurisdiction of Gajulamandhyam police station and not in the jurisdiction of Renigunta Urban police station. 4. Be that as it may, even as per the written instructions submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, no case is registered against the petitioners. 5. Considering the same, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing respondents No.3 and 5 not to disturb the peace of the petitioners without following due process of law. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off at the stage of admission. No costs. 6. 7. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, State A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati Guntur District, AP. of Andhra Pradesh 2. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati Guntur District, AP. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati District, Tirupati, 4. The District Collector, Tirupati District, Tirupati, Erstwhile Chittoor District 5. The Station House Officer, Renigunta Police Station, Renigunta, Tirupati District, Erstwhile Chittoor District. . 6. The Tahsildar, Renigunta, Tirupati District, Erstwhile Chittoor District. 7. One CC to SRI. CHAKRAVARTHY P V S K Advocate [OPUC] 8. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 9. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 10. Three CD Copies PRK HIGH COURT DATED:04/03/2025 ORDER WP.No.5223 of 2025 f 19 MAR 2025 ^ ^ Currenl Seciion to. DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS