SMT. NEETU CHHARI W/O MAUSAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/2907/2025 · 2025-08-27
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8811 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8811 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:35718] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2907/2025 Smt. Neetu Chhari W/o Mausam, R/o Chandla, Ps Chandla, District Chatarpur, Madhya Pradesh, At Present Gadarpura, Rao Sahab Ka Bada, Bajriya, Police Station Nihalganj, Dholpur, District Dholpur (Raj.). (At Present In District Jail Dholpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Kumar Meena Mr. Pradeep Bochaliya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 27/08/2025
1. Instant application for bail is filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the petitioner-accused Smt. Neetu Chhari W/o Mausam in FIR No.30/2025 dated 06.02.2025 registered at P.S. Mahila Thana District - Dholpur, whereby the petitioner- accused has charged under Sections 98, 99, 143(4) and 61 (2)(a) of BNS, 2023.
2. The petitioner was arrested and is in judicial custody since his arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail application.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the petitioner is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a
[2025:RJ-JP:35718] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-2907/2025] married female and is a housewife who adopted a girl on without adopting process as she is not having any child. He further submitted that the petitioner was not having any knowledge about background of child and also the process of adoption. He also submitted that the statements of Bunu Gurang and Latesh Kumari clearly indicate that the present petitioner is unaware about birth and parental details of a new born baby. He further referred findings recorded by the Investigating Officer at the time of filing of charge-sheet and submitted that the petitioner accused is not involved in human trafficking and she belongs from a respectable family. He also submitted that the trial will take time and no purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner-accused in custody. 4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. He has submitted a report received from concerned Police Station. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. On basis of an information, SHO PS Mahila Thana Dholpur has registered a case of human trafficking against the petitioner accused and further after investigation, police found that one of the divorcee woman Bunu Gorang came in contact with someone and ultimately got pregnant and delivered a baby and was given to someone who provided it to the petitioner on certain gratifications. A charge-sheet has
[2025:RJ-JP:35718] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-2907/2025] been filed and there is no criminal antecedents against the petitioner-accused. 7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the petitioner-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the petitioner-accused. 8.
Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of petitioner- accused is hereby allowed and the petitioner-accused Smt. Neetu Chhari W/o Mausam is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner-accused shall not tamper with
evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The petitioner-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The petitioner-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the petitioner-accused shall be liable to be cancelled. [2025:RJ-JP:35718] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-2907/2025]
9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/164