Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
WPCRL 1583/2021 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
None appears for the petitioners.
Mr. Devendra Singh, AGA, with Mr. J.P. Kandpal, Brief Holder for the State. (2) Petitioners have sought quashing of FIR/Case Crime No. 23 of 2021, lodged against them for the offences punishable under Section 323, 504, 506 IPC at PS Kotwali Dehradun (ROP Khurbura), District Dehradun. (3) Learned State Counsel submits that upon investigation, chargesheet has been filed against petitioners. He thus submits that writ petition has become infructuous. (4) Mere filing of chargesheet does not render the writ petition infructuous. I have gone through the impugned FIR, which is on record as Annexure-1 to the writ petition. Specific allegations have been made against the petitioners in the said FIR. (5) Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that allegations are false and baseless, which have been levelled only to harass and humiliate the petitioners. (6) Whether the allegations made in the FIR are correct or not cannot be
examined by this Court in a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The Scope of powers under Article 226 has been considered and discussed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of M/s Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra & others, reported in AIR 2021 SC 1918. None of the tests laid down in the said judgment are met in the present case. Thus there is no scope for interference. (7) Writ petition thus fails and is dismissed.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)
3.1.2025 Pr